|












|
First Strike Technologies, Inc.
. . Fire Streams and Fire Suppression . .
You be the Judge!

Figure 1 represents a fire evolution, which
begins at ignition and then grows until it reaches its peak, then diminishes to the point
where it has consumed all available fuel and extinguishes itself. Your confrontation with
fire is like a boxing match, except in this match the first three-minute round is the most
important. If the match goes beyond the first round youre typically the loser since
you cant win a decision and there are no draws. Refer to the fire curve and imagine
that upon arrival at this fire, its size requires a fire stream flow of 350 gpm to achieve
suppression. If you attack with the needed 350 gpm or greater we will overcome the
BTUs being generated and achieve suppression relatively quick. If you attack with
only a 250 gpm flow, youll notice some darkening and think youre doing great,
but the fire still slowly grows, to a point where it appears youre gaining. Noticing
the fire receding as your attack continues you announce the fire is under control. You
continue your fight until the fire is out and youre pleased because you did another
great job of putting out the fire. Have you? Did you really attack the fire, or
just prolong the inevitable? Your initial attack flow of 250 gpm was less than the
required flow for extinguishment on the incipient stage of the fire. Your long hard fight
slowed the fire, yet it continued its growth until reaching its peak, then diminished to
the size where your 250 gpm flow rate finally extinguished it on the back side of the fire
curve.
Fighting fire on the backside of the curve
is jokingly referred to in the fire service as "saving foundations." With
this in mind, ask yourself a few questions and be honest with your answers!
Which attack method required the most
time, water, manpower, equipment and associated expenses as well as a higher risk of
injury? Which offered a possibility of saving cherished belongings? Most important, which
method stands a better chance of saving lives? |